So i heard by way of IM that the newest expansion of Magic had just come out, so i thought i'd cruise on over to Wizards to see what the spoiler was looking like...
NOT ACCEPTABLE.
i really ought to just write WTC and demand that they just print a card in the next set with game text "Tap to Destroy Target Player" on it.
NOT ACCEPTABLE.
i really ought to just write WTC and demand that they just print a card in the next set with game text "Tap to Destroy Target Player" on it.
6 Comments:
At 12:06 PM,
Third said…
although on the bright side, it doesn't have trample, so you can always laugh maniacally and say "i'll block your horrible, cyclopean elder thing with my scryb sprite. You got anything for your second main phase?"
At 5:15 PM,
Duckmu said…
Also, it's a 30 cost creature. 3 colorless per ice counter removed times 10 ice counters. While it may be nigh indestructable if it's the only thing on someone's side all you need is diabolic edict and they sacrafice it. Or bust out with th eland yourself when they are close to getting the last counter off and the legend rule clears it away.
At 3:07 AM,
23r0 said…
one word boomerang
At 9:52 AM,
Third said…
See, i knew there would be confusion about this. What i was saying wasn't that this is not acceptable because it's busted off at the hilt. What i was saying is that it's not acceptable because WTC has got to the point where, in order to come up with new cards, they have to print outrageous shit like this, so that people will buy them.
At 1:09 AM,
23r0 said…
will the thing about it is that only one card in 157 if you look at the rest of the set amd how other people play it instering but not nothing ground brakeing and busted like say the power 9
At 4:45 AM,
Third said…
apparently i'm still not coming across.
Post a Comment
<< Home